The Mystery Skull
"I want to know why it wasn't looked at three years ago, using the best of science to eliminate Olivia straight away. That is the real story here, why has it taken three years?"
Skull’s Secrets Sought
Barnacles attached to a female human skull may reveal some of the secrets of its owner’s demise following analysis by University of Otago experts.
The skull was pulled from the sea near the mouth of the Waimakariri River, north of Christchurch, by a trawler three years ago, but its owner was never identified, Sen. Constable Graham Lawson, of Christchurch, confirmed yesterday.
In June this year Lyttelton Police handed it to Otago University skeletal anatomist, John Dennison.
As a result of Mr Dennison’s assessment, it emerged that the skull belonged to a female.
Mr Dennison said he discussed the case with professor Jules Kaiser, of the dental school, and the pair concluded the victim was a young woman. She was likely to have been in her late teens or early 20s and probably Caucasian.
“We looked at the shells on it and professor Kaiser came up with the bright idea that a friend of his new a bit about shells and we should take it to him”, Mr Davison said.
The skull went to Dr. Phil Bishop of the zoology department.
Christchurch Press 22/8/02 NZPA
The above news article was the first indication that anyone in the Marlborough area had of the existence of this skull and even though it falls within the parameters of Olivia Hope no information about it had worked it's way into the Operation Tam file. The skull was found (from the information available) slightly before or during Scott Watson's trial. Investigation by Police - NIL, until some three years later.
The Skull has no teeth and so dental examination is not an option. This leaves dating or MtDNA analysis. The dating so far can only say that the skull had been in the water for up to five years. This does not eliminate it as being that of Olivia Hope.
Another approach is to look at the female people between the ages of 15 and 25 who are listed as missing within the area of the find. The Watson family have taken this approach and requested that the police supply this information under the Official Information Act. Here is the police response:
14910 / LH/ CHRIS WATSON OFFICIAL INFORMAT ION / ER5006 / 130902
Friday, 13 September, 2002
Mr C Watson
OFFICIAL INFORMATION REQUEST
I acknowledge your letter of 2 September 2002 and the request that you have made.
In respect of the information pertaining to the Kaikoura and Marlborough areas the request has been referred to the Area Controller in Blenheim.
In respect of the missing females in the Banks Peninsular area there it would take an estimated three hours for Police to locate the information you want, process it and ensure that the applicable requirements of the Official Information Act and the Privacy Act are complied with. There will be copying costs as well incurred.
The payment for this information will need to be lodged with the Police here before the request will be researched. The costs are:
There is no charge for the first hour. Additional time is charged at a rate of $ 28.00 per half-hour or part thereof. In addition, copying charges are payable, at a rate of 20 cents for each page after the first 20 pages.
I do not know just how many pages would need to be copied but if payment of $112.00 is lodged your request will be actioned up until 20 pages have been copied.
Inspector B J McGurk
Acting District Commander
This rather mean spirited letter means that the Watson family is requested by the police to pay for the privilege of doing the work that the police have had three years to do and have not.
Considering the money that police have spent in the past on computer equipment it would be thought that there would exist a national database for missing persons, allowing instant access to this information. This obviously does not exist.
There were a number of sightings of ketches in the Kaikoura - Banks Peninsular area during early 1998. Not all of them identified. It has also been pointed out in the media that the currents on the east coast flow to the north (Remember the "Rose Noel")
The probability of this skull being that of Olivia Hope is small. The possibility that it is that of Olivia Hope remains. Nothing found to date has positively eliminated it from contention.
Reply from Blenhiem Police:
30 September 2002
Mr C J WATSON
P 0 Box 336
Dear Mr. WATSON
Official Information Act Request
I have been asked to respond to your request relating to female persons between the ages of 15 and 25 missing within the Kaikoura and Marlborough areas between 1993 and the end of 1999.
I have checked our records and find that the only outstanding missing female in this area is Olivia HOPE. She was reported missing from Endeavour Inlet on lst January 1998.
I hope this assists.
Further response from Canterbury Police:
7 October 2002
Mr C J Watson
PO Box 336
Dear Mr Watson
OFFICIAL INFORMATION REQUEST; MISSING FEMALES
In response to your letter dated 14 September 2002.
The records relating to the missing females for this area have been searched and no females aged 15 - 25 from the Banks Peninsular area reported missing between 1993 and 1999 are missing now.
Thank you for your cheque for $112.00 (the receipt is attached). The time spent in obtaining and supplying this information was in excess of two hours. In view of the result no further charge will be made for the extra time.
Superintendant S J Manderson
The latest update on the skull is that it could have been in the water for up to 25 year. This still does not eliminate the possibility of the skull belonging to Olivia Hope.